Wednesday, December 29, 2010

Evil - Subjective for Who?

I spent a lovely afternoon in the woods today, wandering up and down the old hills of the Ozarks. It's winter now, and all the trees are stripped bare - you can see for miles when you stand on top of a knob (that's a hill with no trees on top of it, for those that don't know). I enjoy taking this time to think, and I have much to think about these days.

Whenever I spend time outdoors, I try to understand how anyone could assign such things as "good" and "evil" to Nature. Nature just is - there's life, death, survival, beauty, joy, sorrow - our own reactions to what goes on around us is supposed to be a natural thing as well, and yet I constantly see and hear various people dictating how others should react or behave. If you're hungry, you should eat, right? Oh, but if you're even the tiniest bit overweight, you really shouldn't, so just deny yourself what your body is asking for and go against what is essentially one of the most basic and natural conditions known.

When we're happy, we laugh - but be careful because if you laugh too much, people will think you're just stupid, and goodness knows, we don't want anything to think you're stupid, right? That would be bad.... When we're sad, sometimes we cry - but not if your a guy, because guys don't cry... you might be mistaken for something LESS than a man...you know, a girl.... When we're angry, we rage - oh, but that's such an ugly thing to show... we don't want people to see something THAT ugly, because then they might actually think we're angry about something!

Shocking! A real emotion!

When did this all go down the road of badness? Why is it wrong for us to be in touch with our real feelings and deal with them in real situations and on a basic level? Who was it that came along and said, "say, you folks really need to quit acting like yourselves, because that's not right. You need to start acting THIS way - stop enjoying yourselves, stop being spiritual and communing with what's natural, stop loving everyone, stop dancing and drinking, because if you don't, something very terrible is going to happen to you!"

Oh, wait, I think his name was Paul....

Anyway, maybe this guy didn't have proof of something horrible happening if the people didn't stop being happy and normal, but somewhere down the line someone DID have armies at their disposal that could wipe out entire villages if they didn't start following the new company policy. And think about the perks! Wipe out a village and what do you have left? Land, livestock, gold, maybe some jewels.... And if the village did decide to follow the new company policy, what would you get then? Land, livestock, gold - just sign it over to the company, please, and we won't torch your hut! See you on Sunday! Bring money....

Three easy steps to global domination!

And just to make sure no one back-slides and starts dancing in the woods again, let's wrap all that good stuff in shiny red satin and call it EVIL. Punishable by eternity in a fiery pit of lava.

I've been going back and revisiting a lot of what it is that's supposed to be bad. I remember in the late Eighties and early Nineties, my mother had several books by a loon named Texx Marrs. He was supposedly some sort of guru on the evils of the New Age movement - made for great laughs. He declared people like John Denver and Al Gore as Satanic because they believed in environmental conservation. Cartoons like He-Man and Rainbow Brite were evil because they taught children self-confidence and *gasp!* self-love (as in learning to love oneself, not what most kids figure out later in their adolescence! - although that was evil, too....). That sort of stuff is pretty easy to look and say, "yeah, whatever!"

What I was curious about is what most would consider the darker aspects of God and Goddess, and even to a point what most Pagans would consider unethical. Nearly everything we call "unethical" today was most likely "ok" at some point and time in the past. Not saying that makes it ok now - just suggesting a different viewpoint. I am really starting to question why certain actions are considered "dark" or even "unethical" - if a person is trying to follow the Wiccan Rede, I'm sure just about everyone is aware these days that it's damn near impossible to get through life without causing pain at some point and time. It's caused me great distress, because that's how I was raised. No one ever bothered to tell me how to deal with it if I did cause pain. Well, I take that back - one guy did tell me "oh, well - no one ever said life is fair." Yeah, he was real role model.

It bothers me to see Pagans turning away from a thought or idea because it's darker than what they care to see. Excluding an entire school of thought because it makes you uncomfortable is like sleeping with the lights on because of the monster you're sure is under the bed. If there is a monster, he's gonna get you either way. Pretending it isn't there won't make it go away.

But in this case, I want to know - what makes something "dark," "evil," "unethical," or even just "uncomfortable?" I don't believe in evil or absolutes - everything is gray. Where does one draw that imaginary line? Is this truly something we decide for ourselves?

Oh, and in case you're wondering - which I'm sure you're not - the one thing I struggle the most with is manipulation of free will. If people would just do what I want them to, the world would be a much better place! Kidding....

No comments:

Post a Comment